EVALUATION
IN CONFLICT PRONE SETTINGS
Facilitators: Kenneth
Bush (INCORE) & Colleen
Duggan (IDRC)
OVERVIEW
The
course covers the basics of conducting evaluations of
initiatives, broadly understood, in conflict-prone settings.
The focus of the course is not limited to peacebuilding
initiatives, but applies to the evaluation of the full
spectrum of initiatives: development, humanitarian, private
sectors, community development, and so on. “Conflict-prone” setting
is similarly broad in its definition in the course. It
can applied community work on interface areas of inner-cities,
or it can be applied to more conventional, protracted,
militarized conflicts.
Schedule
| Monday
13 June: Varieties of Conflict, Varieties of Evaluation |
Morning
|
INTRODUCTION
- Orientation to course – Rationale,
Logic, Structure, Objectives, Calibration of
Expectations
- What are the principal questions & and
most vexing issues for the evaluation of initiatives
in conflict zones?
|
Afternoon
|
OVERVIEW
OF EVALUATION
- 1) Purposes; (2) Types; (3) Approaches
of Evaluation
- Familiarize students with the underpinning
logic of evaluation, or evaluative thinking more
generally.
- Why do we evaluate? How do we evaluate?
“GOOD” EVALUATION IN CONFLICT
ZONES
- Ingredients of Good Evaluation in
Conflict Zones
- How do context, planning, and peace
and conflict sensitivity fit together and interact
in conflict-prone areas?
|
Tuesday
14 June : KNOW YOUR CONTEXT |
Morning
|
PEACE
AND CONFLICT STAKEHOLDER MAPPING
- Who are the principal groups with
a stake in achieving “peace” or in sustaining
conflict?
- How do different conflicts intersect
(or not) in conflict zones
- When do non-violent conflicts (re)
turn violent?
|
Afternoon
|
RISK & OPPORTUNITY
ASSESSMENT
- Assessing the Impact of the Peace
and Conflict Environments on an initiative
- How might conflicts hurt an initiative?
How might positive “peace” developments
help an initiative? How might particular factors
threaten the effectiveness or efficiency of the initiative
under consideration? How might particular factors
provide opportunities to increase the effectiveness
or efficiency of the initiative under consideration?
Conflict mitigation/ management Strategies What can
you do to avoid/ reduce/ plan for negative conflict
impacts on the initiative? Opportunity Optimization:
How can you take advantage of peace opportunities?
|
Wednesday
15 June:FPLANNING AN EVALUATION (Street-proofing
skills) |
Morning
|
PLANNING
AN EVALUATION
- Developing the critical, analytical,
skills required to prepare, interpret, or commission
evaluations in conflict-prone settings
- Terms of Reference; Assessing Purpose
Statements for an evaluation; Developing Key Evaluation
Questions
- What is the purpose of the particular
evaluation?
- What use will the evaluation be put
to, and who are the principal users?
- What are the critical questions that
will serve as the foundation for the evaluation?
|
Afternoon
|
KEY
EVALUATION QUESTIONS (KEQS)
- To
understand how and why Key Evaluation Question
are the foundation of good evaluations
|
Thursday
16 June: ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES OF PLANNING,
MONITORING AND EVALUATION - OUTCOME MAPPING (OM) |
Morning
|
ETHICS,
POWER, AND POLITICS
- Sensitization to Ethical Dimensions
of Evaluation in Conflict-Prone Areas
- What are the principal ethical consideration
facing evaluators in Conflict-prone areas? How does
the conflict-specific context affect evaluation ethics?
|
Afternoon
|
OUTCOME
MAPPING (OM) – Boot camp
- Understanding the logic, rational,
and approach of Outcome Mapping (OM)
- Develop
a sense of when/where OM is appropriate or not
|
Friday
17 June: PEACE & CONFLICT IMPACT ASSESSMENT
(PCIA) |
Morning
|
THEORY,
PRACTICE & POLITICS OF PCIA
- Distinguishing Peace or Conflict Outcomes
from Other Possible Outcomes
- Introduction
and application of a peace and conflict sensitive
approach to assessing the influence of an initiative
on peace and conflict structures and processes
|
Afternoon
|
ETHEORY,
PRACTICE & POLITICS OF PCIA (con’t)
CLOSING SESSION/ WRAP UP
- Evaluations of the course and closing
discussion on tailoring the course to meet the
challenges in this field
|
Notes
on Facilitators
Kenneth
Bush
Research
Coordinator at INCORE. He received his Ph.D. in International
Relations and Comparative Politics from Cornell University.
From 2004 to 2009, he was a founding professor of the
Conflict Studies Programme at St. Paul University, Ottawa,
Canada. He has developed and taught courses on: Evaluation,
Methodology for Peace and Conflict Studies, Social Justice,
Ethnicized Conflict; Peacebuilding; Post-Cold War Security;
International Relations Theory; Conflict Management; Forced
Displacement; Foreign Policy; and Indigenous Governance. Dr.
Bush has worked with a broad spectrum of development and humanitarian
organizations in the Global North and South. In 2007, he appointed
the independent member of the Monitoring Committee of the
PEACE III Programme (2007-2013). He was Special Advisor on
Humanitarian Issues to the Canadian Government when it served
on the UN Security Council (1998-2000). He has published widely
on issues of peacebuilding, identity-based conflict, and bad
governance. His pioneering work on Peace and Conflict Impact
Assessment (PCIA) has had a continuing impact on the theory
and practice of evaluation in conflict-prone settings.
Colleen
Duggan
Senior program
specialist in the Evaluation Unit of the International Development
Research Centre (IDRC). Colleen Duggan brings expertise in
human rights and the rule of law in divided societies to evaluation
research and practice. Between 2001 and 2005, Duggan spent
five years with IDRC`s Peace Conflict and Development and
Women`s Rights and Citizenship Programs developing programming
in Latin America. Before joining IDRC, Colleen Duggan worked
for over a decade with the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights and for UNDP on issues of humanitarian response, security
sector reform, transitional justice, human rights and peacebuilding
in Colombia, Guatemala, El Salvador and New York. She has
written and published a number of works on early warning and
conflict prevention, gender and transitional justice and peacebuilding
evaluation. Colleen holds an LLM in International Rights and
Humanitarian Law from the University of Essex and a Graduate
Degree in International Development and Cooperation from the
Université d`Ottawa.
READING LIST
N.B. If you have limited time and can only read some things
prior to arriving, we would suggest that you prioritize the
items noted ending with '**'. We will be drawing off of the
other items in presentations and discussions with you.
DAY 1
- Looking Back,
Moving Forward. SIDA Evaluation Manual (2004), Chapter 1, What is
Evaluation, pp.9-21 **
- Utilization-Focused
Evaluation, Michael Quinn Patton, 4th Edition, Sage publications
(2008). Chapter 15, “Processes and Premises”,
pp.571- 573 **
- Utilization-Focused
Evaluation Checklist, Michael Quinn Patton, January 2002, p.1 **
- Utilization-Focused
Evaluation, Michael Quinn Patton, 3th Edition, Sage publications (1997).
Chapter 4, “Intended Uses of Findings” and Chapter 5 “Intended
Process Uses pp.63- 113
- The Program Evaluation Standards, American Evaluation Association
- Conflict Sensitive Approaches to Value Chain Development,
USAID (2008), pp. 1-8
DAY 2
- Hands-On PCIA
Handbook, Kenneth Bush (2003) **
DAY 3
- When and How
to Use External Evaluators, Tracey Rutnik and Marty Campbell(2002) **
- Writing Terms of Reference for an Evaluation, IDRC Evaluation
Highlight 5 (2004)
- Identifying the Intended Use(s) of an Evaluation, IDRC Evaluation
Highlight 6 (2004)
-Identifying the Intended User(s) of an Evaluation, IDRC Evaluation
Highlight 7 (2004)
- Selecting and Managing and Evaluation Consultant or Team,
IDRC Evaluation Highlight 8 (2004)
- Utilization-Focused
Evaluation, Michael Quinn Patton, 4th Edition, Sage publications (2008).
Chapter 14, “Power, Politics
and Ethics, pp. 523-558
DAY 4
- Outcome Mapping:
A realistic alternative for planning, monitoring and evaluation,
Harry Jones and Simon Hearn (2009) **
- Outcome Mapping:
Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Sarah
Earl et al, IDRC (2001)
- Outcome Mapping
Case study: Mobile Phones Network - Northern Ireland
DAY 5
- Hands-On PCIA
Handbook, Kenneth Bush (2003) **
|
Contact
Details
Email: school@incore.ulst.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 28 7137 5500 Fax: +44
(0) 28 7137 5510
INCORE
University of Ulster, Aberfoyle House, Northland Road, Derry/Londonderry
Northern Ireland, BT48 7JL
|